The 29th annual climate conference, Cop29, concluded on Sunday in Azerbaijan, leaving doubts about the effectiveness of the UN process in addressing global heating. According to climate experts at UCL, Mark Maslin, Priti Parikh, and Simon Chin-Yee, this means that we are still facing a future with global warming above 3˚C.
In light of this, The Conversation has compiled a roundup of our climate coverage, which is featured in our award-winning weekly climate action newsletter, Imagine. This newsletter delves deeper into one climate issue every Wednesday and has over 40,000 subscribers.
One of the key outcomes of Cop29 was a commitment to triple the flow of money to the poorest and most climate-vulnerable countries by 2035. However, as Jodi-Ann Jue Xuan Wang, a PhD candidate in international development at the University of Oxford, points out, this falls short of the amount requested by developing countries and is not in the form of no-strings-attached grants, which they need.
The issue of climate finance is further complicated by the lack of a universal definition within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This has allowed rich countries to propose a mix of grants, loans, insurance schemes, and debt swaps, which may not fully address the needs of developing countries. Additionally, the private sector is expected to contribute a significant portion of the required funds, but there are concerns about their ability to do so and the potential consequences of relying on them.
Lisa Vahala, a professor of political science at UCL, highlights the need for compensation for the damage already caused by climate change, such as the loss of cultural heritage and the psychological impact on children affected by extreme weather events. However, as climate finance becomes more entwined with the global financial system, there are concerns about its effectiveness and fairness.
A recent report showed that 72% of climate finance is used for projects that do not directly address climate change, highlighting the need for more transparency and accountability in the distribution of funds. In order to effectively address the climate crisis, it is crucial to have a comprehensive and balanced approach to climate finance that prioritizes the needs of developing countries and ensures that the private sector is held accountable for their contributions.
In conclusion, while Cop29 may have ended with a commitment to increase climate finance, there are still many critical issues that need to be addressed in order to effectively tackle the global climate crisis. It is important for rich countries to fulfill their obligations and provide the necessary funds to support developing countries in their transition to a greener future.